FACULTY OF MEDICINE

Inspection completed checkup: Sebija Izetbegović has only a copy of the student's transcript as proof of schooling in Zagreb

The reason for this is that the acting inspectors were not presented with relevant documentation related to the acquired rights of student Izetbegović at the postgraduate study of the Faculty of Medicine

M. Aš.

What is stated in the findings. Avaz

The inspection procedure within which several inspections of educational inspectors of the Cantonal Administration for Inspection Affairs of SC were performed at the Medical Faculty of the University of Sarajevo in June in the case of checking the fulfillment of conditions for obtaining the master's and doctoral degree and assistant professor Sebija Izetbegović was completed, it was said today from the Cantonal Inspection.

Proof of performed recognition

The inspection says that on the basis of the documentation that was presented, the acting inspectors were able to determine the factual situation according to which the candidate Sebija Izetbegović obtained the degree of doctor of medicine at that faculty in 1989.

But, as they state, having in mind the established factual situation which refers to the manner and procedure of acquiring the scientific degree of Master of Science by candidate Sebija Izetbegović, inspectors based on the documentation provided for inspection in the supervision procedure (including the document as proof of recognition of passed exams from the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb at the Medical Faculty of the University of Sarajevo) "could not assess or give the legal qualification of the data or acquired rights named listed in the certified photocopy of the student's transcript of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb from March 2nd, 1993. "

- The reason is that the acting inspectors were not presented with relevant documentation related to the acquired rights of student Izetbegović at the postgraduate study of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb (curricula, subject syllabuses, fund of hours of lectures, etc.).The inspectors also determined that then valid Statute of the Medical Faculty in Sarajevo from December 7th, 1991, gave members 151 to 153 the opportunity to continue their studies to students of long medical faculties with a clearly defined procedure for transferring students and recognizing passed exams, as well as continuing studies. Among the available documents was the Certificate dated June 5, 1996, signed by the then Dean of the Medical Faculty in Sarajevo, Prof. Dr. Mulabegović Nedžada, as proof that Sebija Izetbegović passed all exams and fulfilled all other obligations in the postgraduate study in Fundamentals of Medical Research -experimental medicine of the Medical Faculty in Sarajevo, which is a public document under the then valid Article 103 of the Statute of that faculty - it was said.


Facsimile of completed inspection. Avaz

In the circumstances of acquiring the academic title of assistant Sebija Izetbegović at the Medical Faculty of the University of Sarajevo, it was determined that she was appointed by the Decision of the UNSA Senate of October 29, 1996 and by the Decision of the Medical Faculty of November 12, 1996.

The condition for the selection of an assistant, pursuant to Article 238 of the then valid statute, was, among other things, the average grade of at least eight from the entire study and at least nine from the subject for which student applied, while candidate Izetbegović, as the public knows, had an average grade 7.38, and from the subject Gynecology and Obstetrics seven - it was said from the inspection.


There was a student training for assistants

However, as stated by the Medical Faculty Sarajevo, in the period when the appointed candidate was elected to the academic title of assistant, at the Medical Faculty it was the practice to select candidates for assistants in certain subjects are chosen by candidates who have a specialist exam in the field in which they are elected, and which the candidate Izetbegović possessed.

- In the statement was also written that it was a post-war period when "there were not enough staff for the normal functioning of the Institution" and "the priority was the establishment and implementation of the teaching-scientific process", as well as "that formal-legal shortcomings, if they existed, were not were only in the specific case. "- it was pointed out.