AFFAIRS

We reveal new details from the indictment in the "Memić" case: Who did police officer Barić talk to at KCUS on the fateful night and how Ožegović deleted surveillance footage from the "Crystal" hotel in Ilidža

Barić was a police officer who took a statement from Alisa Mutap at KCUS on the fateful night, but he did not seize her bloody sweater. The question is who ordered him to take a statement from Zijad Mutap

Miralem Aščić

Josip Barić: Why didn't he seize the bloody sweater of Alisa Mutap. Avaz

A hearing is scheduled for tomorrow in the Court of B&H, according to the proposal of the Prosecutor's Office of B&H to extend the custody of the accused in the "Zijad Mutap and Others" case. They are accused of covering up the murder of Dženan Memić on February 8th, 2016 in Ilidža.

We remind you that Alisa Mutap, Dženan Memić's ex-girlfriend who was with him in Great Alley on the fateful night, her father Zijad, police officers Hasan Dupovac and Josip Barić and Muamer Ožegović, an employee of the Crystal Hotel in Ilidža, are the accused.


No amnesia

The Prosecutor's Office of B&H rightly requests that the accused, who are defending themselves at large, be returned to custody, which can now last up to three years.

As we published earlier, from the filed and confirmed indictment, which was submitted to "Avaz" from sources close to the Court, it is clear that Alisa Mutap refused to state all the facts that were very well known to her as an eyewitness and that it was established that on the fateful night she was conscious and communicative.

According to the indictment, Alisa's father Zijad is the organizer of a group whose goal was to cover up the real perpetrators and the real way in which Dženan Memić suffered severe bodily injuries as a result of which he died.

However, the indictment contains new details, primarily when it comes to SC MUP police officer Josip Barić and employee of the "Crystal" hotel in Ilidža Muamer Ožegović, who worked at the hotel reception on the fateful night.

Barić was a police officer who took a statement from Alisa Mutap at KCUS, but he did not seize her bloody sweater, although he had a clear order to do so.


Facsimile of the indictment against Josip Barić. Avaz

The indictment also states that Barić questioned Zijad Mutap, Alisa's father, whom he has known for many years, at the KCUS. So far nothing has been known about it.

However, it is indicative that Barić also had a conversation with Alisa Mutap at KCUS, although he was not authorized to do so by the then acting prosecutor.

It was pointed out that Barić was interested in the degree of Dženan Memić's injuries and was collecting information about it. It all happened on February 8 and 9, 2016, in the late evening hours in the premises of this medical institution.

- He had informative conversations with Alisa Ramić (maiden name Mutap), knowing that Alisa Ramić (maiden name Mutap) was the only eyewitness to Dženan Memić's suffering, and he presented the content of the informative conversation with Alisa and the facts presented in official documents on several occasions in different ways. After the acting prosecutor ordered him to seize all items originating from the injured Dženan Memić and Alisa Mutap, including complete clothes with traces of blood, at the KCUS premises, he knowingly failed to seize the bloody sweater from Alisa Mutap, which was visibly bloody, which was important evidence for determining the manner and place of Dženan Memić's death - the indictment alleges.


Ožegović had access to a surveillance camera system

As for the accused Ožegović, it is stated that as a worker at the reception of the Crystal Hotel in Ilidža, it was pointed out that in order to prevent the establishment of facts and circumstances regarding the death of Dženan Memić, he "deliberately deleted surveillance camera footage from 8 to February 11, 2016. "

The prosecution stated that Ožegović had access to a surveillance camera system. Earlier, members of the SC Ministry of the Interior tried to seize the recordings, but were prevented from doing so due to a power outage.

- After members of the SC Ministry of the Interior re-entered the premises of the Crystal Hotel on 22 June 2016, they established that the videos had been intentionally deleted, which was also established in the SC Ministry of the Interior's expert report of 15 March 2016 and the findings of the Agency for Forensic Examinations of April 19, 2016 - the indictment alleges.

Prosecutors believe that surveillance camera footage of the Crystal Hotel provided important evidence to establish all the circumstances.